![Bristol woman's five-year fight to take the police to court over racial discrimination]()
This is Bristol --
A BRISTOL woman has taken Avon and Somerset police to court, accusing them of racial discrimination. But the force will not be able to call any officers to give evidence due to the "incompetence" of its own lawyer.
The constabulary has been taken to the High Court by Bianca Durrant, who claims that in 2009 she was wrongly arrested and ill-treated due to the colour of her skin. Since then, the 34-year-old from Downend has been fighting the force, representing herself in court with the help of her mum Judy.
There was due to be a six-day trial at the Royal Courts of Justice in London last June. But due to its in-house legal team missing a number of deadlines to provide witness statements to Miss Durrant, the constabulary will not be able to call eight police officers as witnesses.
Instead, the force will have to rely on statements and documents from the time of arrest and initial criminal investigation. Not only could this make the constabulary's case more difficult, the additional hearings have added extra costs to the taxpayer in a case that has already gone on for a number of years.
Miss Durrant, who is of mixed race, has accused the force of racial discrimination, false imprisonment, and corruption, and made other claims in relation to her arrest on suspicion of assaulting a taxi marshal in Bristol city centre.
That night, she was arrested along with two white friends. Clerk Miss Durrant was the only one placed in the caged area of a police van and claims she was discriminated against while in custody.
This included being refused permission to go to the toilet and ending up wetting herself in front of officers.
She was charged with public disorder and assaulting a taxi marshal, but both charges were dropped at trial, with no evidence offered. The forces denies all of Miss Durrant's allegations.
Miss Durrant complained to the force's Professional Standards Department, which found nothing untoward other than that the officer who dealt with her had made an "error of judgment" by not allowing her to go to the toilet.
The force apologised and offered £200 compensation – which she did not accept – and no disciplinary action was taken against any officers.
Miss Durrant then complained to the Independent Police Complaints Commission, which reviewed the PSD decision but rejected her appeal. Since then she has continued to protest all the way to the highest civil courts in the land.
In November 2012, Justice Lang ordered that witness statements were to be exchanged by January 21 last year.
After the police failed to meet that deadline, Justice Mitting granted an extension to March 12, 2013, and said any statements served after that date could not be used in evidence. Police missed that deadline and, despite the warnings, did not make a relief-from-sanction application – to be forgiven that lapse – for another two months.
On June 10, the first day of trial, His Honour Judge Birtles ruled in the police's favour and said the late evidence should be allowed. But at the Court of Appeal in December, following a legal precedent set by the case of Mitchell versus News Group Newspapers and an appeal from Miss Durrant, that decision was overturned by three justices.
In a critical judgement, they wrote: "The failure to meet the final deadline was not the result of any unforeseeable event. It was due to incompetence, as Judge Birtles found, and was simply inexcusable."
The justices said the force has a "real prospect of successfully defending the case", and that the lack of witnesses "will make the claimant's task that much easier, but she will still need to prove her case".
Defiant Miss Durrant, of Chepstow Park, said: "I am very happy about winning the appeal. Throughout my three- year proceedings, I believe Avon and Somerset Constabulary have continually abused process and have not adhered to the civil procedure rules. It will make my case easier as the officers in question cannot be called as witnesses. I do not have any fears. The battlefield has been cleared. I am now able to present my case and justice will be done."
The in-house lawyer, Nicola Hammond, who was responsible for drafting the release from sanction is still working on the case for the constabulary, and has now instructed barrister Alan Payne.
Sue Dauncey, director of legal services for Avon and Somerset police, said: "I recognise that the timescales for submitting certain witness statements slipped in this case. This should not have happened, but it is exceptional. At the time, Ms Hammond was dealing with a heavy workload of complex cases including this one.
"Much of our legal work is carried out by a team of in-house lawyers, like Ms Hammond, all of whom provide a highly-professional service and excellent value for money. I have total confidence in every one of them.
"As a result of this case and recent changes following the Andrew Mitchell case in November we have reviewed our management of civil litigation to make sure this does not recur."
The new date for trial has not been set.
Reported by This is 20 hours ago.